Video Ethics

The NPPA Code of Ethics serves as a guide to follow when editing video, audio and photographs. Personally, I agree with the ethical concerns surrounding audio and video editing. As with writers, accuracy is the 'guiding principle of our profession' and should not be compromised for any reason, especially to tell a story. The example given about the TV station adding audio to a silent surveillance tape caught my attention. It provided an appropriate example of simple neglect and unethical decision making. Although the sounds of slot machines and two gun shots were probably similar to the actual incident, they were not factual and shouldn't have been added to the story. Although adding such audio may provide a more entertaining clip, news is supposed to be factual and entertainment shouldn't be the editors primary focus. If simple background noises are deemed acceptable, then where does it stop. Would a voice over of a woman screaming for mercy as the gunman pulled the trigger be added as well!? In my opinion, heightening any 'news' story or aspect of a story constitutes fiction. A false reality should not be presented for the sake of entertainment.

Contradicting my previous assertions, I feel the incorporation of a soundtrack audio recording or simple sound effects can be used sparingly. As the article mentioned, "it should be obvious and apparent to the viewer that the journalist has chosen to alter the scene or sound." Furthermore, the additional sound must not, in any circumstance, "add an editorial tone to the story that would not be present (w/o the music). In some instances, the use of music and the like may meet these guidelines and be considered appropriate.